The Mummy and Suspense

I watched the new The Mummy movie from Universal’s Dark Universe franchise. It was more of an action movie than a horror movie.That got me thinking, what could have made it more horror?

Suspense seemed to be the missing component. At every step, the audience knew what was happening and what to expect. It would have been a cheat to bring out something completely unexpected, but there really needed to be some mystery.

Maybe suspense is difficult. Perhaps I’m asking too much, though I’ve seen plenty of movies with proper suspense. I wondered it I could pull off that sort of thing. That called for an experiment.

The Experiment

I sat in the Bistro on the writers’ night. Strange writer people sat around small tables, lost in conversations together or manuscripts alone. Bottles of wine filled the shelves that covered all the walls. The country music played a touch too loud for writing. The yellow lights were almost too dim for a pencil-and-notebook writer like me.

It should have been a good time to write, but something tugged at my mind. There was something not quite right, but I couldn’t tell what.

By nature, most writers are odd. Being in a group relaxes them enough that they let their strangeness flow more freely. I couldn’t pick any particular one of them that could be setting off my warnings. Maybe it was something else.

Cold air blasted from a vent near my feet. I hadn’t seen the vent lurking under the wine shelves. What other things could be hidden there? Old stories often include hidden things on or behind shelves. Disguised latches led to secret passages which led to the dark secrets themselves.

The Bistro was not the first occupant of this space. The structure was at least a century old and probably more. What had been here originally? What has lived here since?

It was a common theme in the area. The latest things covered over the past. Often, it was just a layer of new, a facade, lying atop the old. That-which-had-been slumbered beneath, projecting a subtle silhouette of itself on the surface.

Seventy million years ago, all of this sat in the silt of the Great Inland Sea, so the scientists said. As fearsome beasts fed in the sea above, the missed bits of their prey settled. Now those bits were fossils, old bones embedded in stones, dead to the world.

That was long past. So were the inhabitants of the last centuries, the pioneers and their children. What bones did they leave? Was it their own bones or that of their prey? Perhaps just the bones of labor and dreams.

I realized that my imagination was being active. The Bistro may be new in an old building, but there are building codes and inspections, especially when food is concerned. Anything bad left by the previous occupants would have been removed.

The same imagination remarked, “The inspectors only look at physical things.”

Cold continued its flow from the hidden vent beside me. A modern air conditioning system would blow air from the ceiling where it could settle and mix with the room air. The floor vent was just another leftover from elder days; the past infringing on the present.

When would floor vents have been put in? How far back did they go? Obviously they went back to when people could smoke cigarettes in businesses. Did it go back to bellbottom pants? Did it reach the days when men wore fedoras? When did it replace the pot bellied stove in the old shop?

How many people breathed the air that then went through those ducts? Was it just air, or did each person leave a subtle shade of themselves with each exhalation?

Again, an imagination running wild. Left on its own, it would build a community of ghosts lurking in the structure. Every employee, every customer, every mouse that ever sheltered under this roof adding to the specters dwelling in the walls.

I focused on shaking the feeling of presence. If it was just imagination, it could be overcome by thinking. With effort, I finally convinced myself that there was nothing in the vents nor in the shelves.

Relaxation came back and I could devote myself to writing. I did so with vigor.

As for the hidden vent beside my table, it continued to blow cold air. In the walls, the community of ghosts welcomed the small shadow of me that would always be there.

Analysis

My first concern was that this piece didn’t seem to tell much of a story. What was the conflict? What was the resolution? Then I realized it was one of those man versus himself stories the academics describe.

The narrator is fighting his own sense that something is subtly haunting his environment. Can he resolve this? He thinks he reaches resolution when he shakes the feeling and continues with his intended task. However, the real resolution would seem to be that the building has gotten the little piece of him that it wanted and it has let the rest of him go.

I noticed that the imagery of the piece seems to repeat. There is mention of pieces of prey falling to the seafloor to become fossils permanently stored. Then, there are references to pieces of the past protruding into the present. Finally, the story touches on pieces of the previous residents (human and animal) that are left behind. This all leads to the community of ghosts taking just a piece of the narrator.

As for suspense, that is more difficult to tell. I really think I would need an external audience to tell me if this is suspenseful. The problem is that I already know the story, so objectivity is out the window.

The attempt at suspense included several things. First, the narrator feels that something is wrong, but cannot give anymore detail than that. The idea is to leave the details as something to be revealed later and, hopefully, encourage the reader to go forward to the end.

The description of the bistro itself was intended to provide an uncomfortable place for a writer. Many writers would prefer a coffee shop, since those tend to be quieter and more cosy. The idea of loud country music and dim, yellow lights would seem inappropriate. I’ve also noticed that many people associate yellow lights with places that are not well lit and are more isolated.

The shelves and the vent should suggest hidden things. Mentioning the shelves in old movies should help bring up imagery that the reader already carries. Along with those images should be the feelings the reader experienced while watching those movies. If the person can bring along previous unease or fear, then it will just help add to the current feelings.

Existing fears are the reason for mentioning the Great Inland Sea. Many people don’t like the idea of deep waters and the predators that lurk there. The idea that the current dry land was once at the bottom of that sea is a little unsettling. Old fossils from that time are common, so it acts as a reminder of ancient death that still pokes through into our world. The ancient body of water can also tap into the imaginations of those who are fans of Lovecraft.

The mentions of all the people who have come and gone helps bring up the idea that many of those people are deceased. The proprietor of the business in the nineteen thirties would be long passed, and yet that person spent many days at the establishment, leaving breath and sweat, and whatever spirit one leaves through proximity. This suggests a gradual building of whatever it is the narrator is feeling.

The last attempt to add suspense is denial from the narrator. At several points, the narrator attempts to convince himself that the sensations are the work of an overactive imagination. If he had simply accepted that something was wrong, he would have chosen to walk out and been done with the whole thing. Good stories are rarely based on the protagonist making the wise decision to not get involved. By resisting his feelings, the narrator makes himself stay long enough for something to actually happen.

Those are my attempts to add suspense. Again, I cannot be objective about its effectiveness; I can only hope. Maybe that’s where the movie writers went wrong. Perhaps they did not get objective feedback on the suspense needed to make a horror movie instead of an action movie. On the other hand, it’s possible some executives somewhere decided that action was the way to go.

World Building and Economics

Economics is not about money; it is about resources. Everyone should study at least the basics, even though many would find it boring. However, if you are a writer and building a world, it is even more important that you know something about this subject. Here’s why:

As noted, economics is about resources, and their efficient use. Your fictional world has resources, so you should probably know what they are and who has them. There are natural resources, labor resources, and even intellectual resources (knowledge, skills, beliefs). Many historical conflicts are based on imbalances of resources and how people react to those imbalances.

Resources are also tied to political power. Those who control resources tend to control everything else. Just look at the power that large advertisers have in our real world. In your fictional world, this is likely to be true as well. Think about the good guys in your world and what they have. How does that compare to what the bad guys have? Is that a motivating factor for one side or the other?

Example: My World

I’ve been writing short stories and snippets of history for a fictional world for many years now. It is a well developed history for a fantasy world that has been used more for my mental exercise than anything else. I really should get around to publishing some of it some day. For now, though, it makes a good example of the effect of economics in a fictional world.

In my world, which has a dark-ages level of technology, there are tall mountains in the west that act as a natural barrier for most people. There are people who live there and produce metal from mines. They sell this metal to the farmers who live in the plains just to the east of them.

The farmers only have grain and some livestock to trade for the metal, but only a small amount because they are not very productive. To make matters worse, the Bad Guys live just to the south of them and often raid the farms for food and whatever else they can find. Note that the Bad Guys consider the farmers to be among the food items.

To the southwest, there is a forested area populated by a people called Lovelos. These people produce fruit and nuts for food and try to trade for other things. They are cut off from the grain farmers by the mountains and the Bad Guys. However, they do trade food to the mountain people for metals.

The Lovelos also have a sea coast that lets them circumvent the Bad Guys’ territory to the south and reach the fisher folk who live in the south east and south central shores of the continent. Because the fisher folk only fish, they have a Comparative Advantage (economics term) that means the Lovelos do not have to develop their fishing skill so much and can focus on their forests and fighting the Bad Guys. This gives the fisher folk access to fruits, nuts, and lumber.

All of this trade affects who can interact with whom, so it affects the spread of news, cooperation in the war, and who eats what. As an example, if a person from the fisher folk encounters a Lovelo, there would be an inclination to trust. However, a farmer from the plains would have little interaction with Lovelos and be less inclined to trust them. The fisher folk would know of the mountain people, but only get second-hand metal through trade with Lovelos or farmers.

Should the Bad Guys ever be defeated (no spoilers), there would be many story opportunities related to the establishment of trade routes and the effects of social interaction. Who would control those lands? Who would manage the natural resources there? These are sources for conflict and conflicts are sources for stories.

In my study of economics, I found that most people think the topic is boring. I get that; it’s not everybody’s cup of tea. Even so, if you are building worlds of your own, you should consider doing a least a little reading. The specific sub-topic is Macroeconomics, which focuses on large systems, such as nations and states.

Note: My undergraduate degree was in computer science, but I loved my economics classes, so I started grad school in an economics program. The math was really intense and, though I loved every headachy minute of it, I decided that I was lazy. I decided to make use of my Absolute Advantage in computing (which is easy for me) and switched back to computer science.

Still Not Submitted

My novel was, I thought, ready for submission. Then I found out that the agent that gave such good feedback had switched gears and started working in indie publishing. I’m probably too lazy for indie publishing at this time and would prefer to go the more traditional route. So now I must go back to preparing for that.

The main difference is that I need to rewrite my letter and synopsis. I should make more progress on these things, but avoidance and work have taken precedence. The only one to blame is me, and I’m also the only one to fix this.

I already had a letter and synopsis ready. However, I did get some critiques of those and it seems that they need to be modernized. All of the material I read about how to do them is, apparently, out of date. The modern form for both requires much more detail about the story and must be written almost as short stories themselves. It seems that the letter and the synopsis are there to convey not only information about your story, but to prove that you are a storyteller.

Given the competitive nature of the business, all of this makes sense. These first contacts are a chance to separate potentially good writers from the mediocre. It’s the same way I look at the format and writing of a resume when I have to make hiring recommendations; if it’s bad, it doesn’t make it.

Now I’m worrying myself over the content of the letter and synopsis. Obviously I can write an entire novel’s worth of material about my novel (quite a bit more, actually, based on my notes). How much is too much? When is it exciting enough? What will be intriguing enough to hook an agent without overburdening them text?

My normal cure when faced with writing difficulty is to meditate. This is another case where that will have to happen. I’m just going to have to do it and stop thinking about doing it. That’s how I got the novel written in the first place. That’s how I will have to get it published.

Hairy Vetch

Presented here, the hairy vetch
A lowly, crawling, little wretch
Over nothing this thing towers
With its white and violet flowers

But, oh, together with its friends
Protects the soil from the winds
An army built of hairy stems
Weathering all the winter’s whims

Then when vetch has done its job
With hairy tendrils and seed pods
The glory does not end with winter
The vetch for livestock is provender

Avoiding Submission

Despite the full and irregular schedule of my day job, I’ve completed the recommended changes to my novel. That should be a cause for happiness. For some reason, though, I’ve been avoiding the actual submission process. That is obviously an issue.

Even sending it to the same agent who made the recommendations (the current plan) seems worrisome. There seems to be an actual fear of the submission. Sure, the worst she can say is no, but I think that particular no can hit with more weight than I want to feel.

It’s as though there is a dark blotch of despair lurking in the farthest borders of my mind. It circles the hope I’ve attached to the novel. It senses the possibility of death for that hope. If I get another rejection, I fear the despair will dive fast and rip the hope to shreds.

Of course, I’m not actually that susceptible to any long-term anguish. A rejection would bring disappointment, but I’m a big boy and can handle it. MY old writer’s group used to joke that you couldn’t really understand being a writer until you could wallpaper your office with rejection letters. It just comes with the territory.

For now, I’m going to chalk it up to the extra stress and exhaustion of the day job. I’ll put the submission process on an actual to-do list; I tend to actually accomplish those tasks. Before too long, the manuscript will be on its way. If it doesn’t sell, I’ll make changes and try again. At some point, one of my other writings will be ready for the same process and I’ll start that one out as well. As long as I enjoy the writing process itself, I’m good.

It would be nice to sell something, though.